In Defense: Israel and the Jews

There's a popular saying, repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth. That means that it doesn't matter if something is actually true or not. What matters is that if you say it enough times, then people will "believe" to be true. Such is the case when it comes to Israel and genocide. This lie is repeated often enough, that people accept it as fact. Notice, I said a fact, not the truth. Because the truth is, there is no genocide, and I'm giving twelve reasons why:  1. The Gaza Health Ministry is not a reliable source of reported civilian causalities. They are controlled by Hamas, who have a vested interest in inflating causalities of war. 2. The UN is not a reliable source of reported civilian causalities. They only parrot the Gaza Health Ministry and have a known history of being biased against Israel. 3. There's been zero outside verification to confirm the actual number of civilian casualties in Gaza. 4. The Gaza Health Ministry makes no distinction ...

Where exactly does the name "Palestine" come from? The earliest records we have can be traced back to the Egyptian word "Peleset" around 1150 BC, which referred to a neighboring region of people whom most historians generally identify as the Philistines. The Philistines were believed to be a seafaring people who migrated from the eastern Mediterranean to the southern Levant region around the 12th century BC. They began to decline and disappear as a distinct people from the 8th and 6th centuries BC from conquest and assimilation. The Hebrews called the Philistines "Plištīm" or "Pelishtim" and referred to the region they occupied as "Peleshet." Both the Hebrew "Peleshet" and the Egyptian “Peleset” are derived independently but refer to the same geographic region and the people that inhabited them, the Philistines. In Biblical times, the Philistines occupied primarily the coastal regions in what today is southwestern Israel, incl...

The following is a deceptive map depicting Palestinian lands lost to Israel: http://images.alarabiya.net/israel-palestine_map_19225_2469.jpg This map is deceptive because it begins with a false premise, that is all the land initially belonged to the Palestinians. This is false. First of all, the land previously belonged to the Ottoman Turks. Secondly, there is not a distinct ethnic people with a distinct language known as the Palestinians. Palestine was originally known as the land of Judea by the Romans. After a series of Jewish revolts against Rome, Roman Emperor Hadrian renamed the land "Palestine" ( Philistia ) around 135 AD, after the Jews ancestral enemies the Philistines, and the name stuck. The idea was to disconnect the land from the Jews. The Roman coin below commemorates the Roman victory with the words "Judea Capta" meaning "[the land of Judea] is captured." Fast forward several centuries later and the region is now under the...

On June 17, 2010, political analyst and author Jeremy R. Hammond posted an article entitled " Top Ten Myths about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict " in which he attempts to dispel the myths surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a decisively Anti-Israel perspective. Since his article encompasses so many of the arguments and criticisms that are levied against Israel, it's the perfect piece in which to refute those allegations which are routinely used to demonize and delegtimize Israel. Feel free to share without my permission, just give proper credit. #1 – Jews and Arabs have always been in conflict in the region. Claim: Jews and Arabs have not always been in conflict until Zionism. Arab and Jew relations Jews and Arabs have always had a contemptuous relationship.While Jews and Arabs lived in relative peace at various times with Jews, peaceful coexistence meant subordination and degradation. Under Islamic law Jews held dhimmi status, meaning that they...

#2 - The United Nations created Israel Claim: The United Nations, under UNSCOP, did not create Israel because both parties did not accept Resolution 181. The reason for the partition in the first place The UNSCOP came to the conclusion that the conflicting national aspirations of the Arabs and Jews could not be reconciled. The only solution was to partition two states, one Jewish the other Arab. Despite that the Jews were not happy with the small allotment of territory and they would not have Jerusalem they accepted the compromise. This despite the land allotted to the Jews was only 13% of the original British Mandate for a purposed Jewish state. The Arabs rejected it, despite there being 22 Arab states and one Jewish state. Why there were no Arab representatives The reason UNSCOP contained no representatives from any Arab country was because the Arab Higher Committee boycotted the Commission. The Arab League Secretary Azzam Pasha, speaking to Jewish Agency representatives ...

#3 – The Arabs missed an opportunity to have their own state in 1947. Claim: The Arabs are justified in rejecting the 1947 U.N. partition plan because the land was stolen from them in the first place and rightfully belonged to them. Land Ownership As previously noted, Jews were the majority in the land allotted to them under UN Resolution 181. While Jewish immigration increased from Europe, Jews never had a chance to reach majority in the region. Jewish immigration and land purchases under the British Mandate period were severely restricted, while Arabs were free to enter the country. And many Arabs did immigrate by the thousands, which had been in decline prior to the Mandate in 1922. Jews would have been given 55 percent of the land for a state, and Arabs 45 percent. However this 45 percent was on top of the 77 percent of the original mandate which was intended for the Jewish state, but under Arab pressure was cut off and granted to the Hashemites. It was Jordan that was mea...